NPS vs PPF vs EPF

EPF (Employees' Provident Fund) is the mandatory retirement scheme for salaried employees, with both employer and employee contributing a fixed percentage of basic salary. It earns a government-declared interest rate, is fully employer-linked, and is largely illiquid until retirement or specific permitted withdrawals (home purchase, medical emergencies, unemployment).

PPF (Public Provident Fund) is open to anyone, salaried or not, with a 15-year lock-in (extendable in 5-year blocks) and a government-declared interest rate that resets quarterly. It's one of the few instruments in India that's fully tax-exempt at all three stages: contribution, interest earned, and withdrawal — genuinely rare, and worth using even by people who also have EPF.

NPS (National Pension System) is market-linked, letting you choose an allocation between equity, corporate bonds and government securities, generally giving it higher long-term return potential than EPF or PPF, but with real market risk attached. It also carries an additional ₹50,000 tax deduction beyond the standard 80C limit, making it a common way to reduce taxable income further once 80C is maxed out elsewhere.

A common approach: use EPF as the mandatory base (no choice involved for salaried employees), max out PPF for a genuinely risk-free, fully tax-exempt long-term component, and use NPS for the extra deduction plus some market-linked growth — while noting NPS requires compulsorily annuitizing a portion of the corpus at retirement, which reduces its overall flexibility compared to the other two.